Jumat, 30 April 2010
Meatball Ravioli Soup
Obesity ups risk of painful fibromyalgia
The study in women found that being overweight or obese was associated with increased risk of fibromyalgia, especially among women who weren't all that physically active.
It is well established that maintaining a healthy lifestyle, including staying fit, trim and active helps prevent several chronic conditions such as heart disease and high blood pressure, Paul J. Mork, who led the study, noted in an email to Reuters Health.
"Our study indicates that a similar association also exists for development of" fibromyalgia," writes Mork, from the Human Movement Science Program, Norwegian University of Science and Technology in Trondheim.
Fibromyalgia is a debilitating pain syndrome that affects an estimated 2 to 4 percent of the population. It's characterized by chronic pain, often in the neck, shoulders, back, hips, arms and legs. Fatigue, depressed mood, and difficulty thinking and sleeping are other common symptoms. There is no clear-cut cause.
Mork said while an association between fibromyalgia and being overweight or obese has been shown in prior "cross-sectional" studies, his is the first forward looking, or "prospective" study to document being overweight or obese as independently raising one's risk of developing the pain syndrome.
The findings, published in the journal Arthritis Care and Research, are based on nearly 16,000 physically able, fibromyalgia-free women who were followed for 11 years. During this time, 380 developed fibromyalgia.
Overweight and obese women had a 60 percent to 70 percent higher risk of developing fibromyalgia over the study period, relative to their normal-weight counterparts, the researchers found.
They also found that women who said they exercised 4 or more times a week had a 29 percent lower risk of developing fibromyalgia compared to inactive women. A look at the number of hours exercised each week revealed that women who said they got 2 or more hours a week had a 23 percent lower risk of the pain syndrome.
In looking at the combined effects of exercise and body weight on risk of fibromyalgia, the researchers found a greater than two-fold increased risk for overweight or obese women who were either inactive or who reported exercising for 1 hour or less each week. There was no clear relationship between exercise and risk of fibromyalgia in normal-weight women.
Overall, this study found a "weak protective" effect of leisure time physical activity on future development of fibromyalgia, Mork noted. "This was somewhat unexpected and needs further exploration," he admitted.
However, Mork said it's important to note that his team was not able to differentiate between different types of exercise "and it might be possible that some exercise types are more beneficial than others in protecting against future development of fibromyalgia."
He and his colleagues conclude, based on their study and others, that maintaining a healthy weight and regular exercise are important for reducing the risk of fibromyalgia.
SOURCE: Arthritis Care and Research, May 2010.
What's so bad about Fried Food?
Kamis, 29 April 2010
Happening in the Neighborhood
Bookworm Bundle - Save 20% at LivingAfterWLS Store
Rabu, 28 April 2010
Day 17/365 Push-ups
For instance, today's workout had 5 sets with 120 second break between sets. The first set was 20 push-ups, the second had 25, third 15, fourth 15, and the final set at 25. Every day, the numbers of push-ups in each set increases with the final goal of being able to do 1 set of 100 push-ups by week 6.
Today I started to feel some soreness in my shoulder joints. Never a good sign to have joint pain. Luckily, by the time evening came and I started the workout, I didn't notice anything.
This is a lofty goal. I am not sure if I can do it in 6 weeks, but I am going to try my best. I have nothing to loose, so why not!
More information on the 100 push-up training: http://hundredpushups.com/
This is what I did today:
Elliptical: 15 min @ level 15
Hundred Push-up Challenge: Week 3 Day 2 (100 push-ups)
Grains as Food: an Update
Last year, I published a post on the Diet and Reinfarction trial (DART), a controlled trial that increased grain fiber intake using whole wheat bread and wheat bran supplements, and reported long-term health outcomes in people who had previously suffered a heart attack (1). The initial paper found a trend toward increased heart attacks and deaths in the grain fiber-supplemented group at two years, which was not statistically significant.
What I didn't know at the time is that a follow-up study has been published. After mathematically "adjusting" for preexisting conditions and medication use, the result reached statistical significance: people who increased their grain fiber intake had more heart attacks than people who didn't during the two years of the controlled trial. Overall mortality was higher as well, but that didn't reach statistical significance. You have to get past the abstract of the paper to realize this, but fortunately it's free access (2).
Here's a description of what not to eat if you're a Westerner with established heart disease:
Those randomised to fibre advice were encouraged to eat at least six slices of wholemeal bread per day, or an equivalent amount of cereal fibre from a mixture of wholemeal bread, high-fibre breakfast cereals and wheat bran.Characteristics of Grain Fiber
The term 'fiber' can refer to many different things. Dietary fiber is simply defined as an edible substance that doesn't get digested by the human body. It doesn't even necessarily come from plants. If you eat a shrimp with the shell on, and the shell comes out the other end (which it will), it was fiber.
Grain fiber is a particular class of dietary fiber that has specific characteristics. It's mostly cellulose (like wood; although some grains are rich in soluble fiber as well), and it contains a number of defensive substances and storage molecules that make it more difficult to eat. These may include phytic acid, protease inhibitors, amylase inhibitors, lectins, tannins, saponins, and goitrogens (3). Grain fiber is also a rich source of vitamins and minerals, although the minerals are mostly inaccessible due to grains' high phytic acid content (4, 5, 6).
Every plant food (and some animal foods) has its chemical defense strategy, and grains are no different*. It's just that grains are particularly good at it, and also happen to be one of our staple foods in the modern world. If you don't think grains are naturally inedible for humans, try eating a heaping bowl full of dry, raw whole wheat berries.
Human Ingenuity to the Rescue
Humans are clever creatures, and we've found ways to use grains as a food source, despite not being naturally adapted to eating them**. The most important is our ability to cook. Cooking deactivates many of the harmful substances found in grains and other plant foods. However, some are not deactivated by cooking. These require other strategies to remove or deactivate.
Healthy grain-based cultures don't prepare their grains haphazardly. Throughout the world, using a number of different grains, many have arrived at similar strategies for making grains edible and nutritious. The most common approach involves most or all of these steps:
- Soaking
- Grinding
- Removing 50-75% of the bran
- Sour fermentation
- Cooking
In the next post, I'll explain why these processing steps greatly improve the nutritional value of grains, and I'll describe recipes from around the world to illustrate the point.
* Including tubers. For example, sweet potatoes contain goitrogens, oxalic acid, and protease inhibitors. Potatoes contain toxic glycoalkaloids. Taro contains oxalic acid and protease inhibitors. Cassava contains highly toxic cyanogens. Some of these substances are deactivated by cooking, others are not. Each food has an associated preparation method that minimizes its toxic qualities. Potatoes are peeled, removing the majority of the glycoalkaloids. Cassava is grated and dried or fermented to inactivate cyanogens. Some cultures ferment taro.
** As opposed to mice, for example, which can survive on raw whole grains.
Grains as Food: an Update
Last year, I published a post on the Diet and Reinfarction trial (DART), a controlled trial that increased grain fiber intake using whole wheat bread and wheat bran supplements, and reported long-term health outcomes in people who had previously suffered a heart attack (1). The initial paper found a trend toward increased heart attacks and deaths in the grain fiber-supplemented group at two years, which was not statistically significant.
What I didn't know at the time is that a follow-up study has been published. After mathematically "adjusting" for preexisting conditions and medication use, the result reached statistical significance: people who increased their grain fiber intake had more heart attacks than people who didn't during the two years of the controlled trial. Overall mortality was higher as well, but that didn't reach statistical significance. You have to get past the abstract of the paper to realize this, but fortunately it's free access (2).
Here's a description of what not to eat if you're a Westerner with established heart disease:
Those randomised to fibre advice were encouraged to eat at least six slices of wholemeal bread per day, or an equivalent amount of cereal fibre from a mixture of wholemeal bread, high-fibre breakfast cereals and wheat bran.Characteristics of Grain Fiber
The term 'fiber' can refer to many different things. Dietary fiber is simply defined as an edible substance that doesn't get digested by the human body. It doesn't even necessarily come from plants. If you eat a shrimp with the shell on, and the shell comes out the other end (which it will), it was fiber.
Grain fiber is a particular class of dietary fiber that has specific characteristics. It's mostly cellulose (like wood; although some grains are rich in soluble fiber as well), and it contains a number of defensive substances and storage molecules that make it more difficult to eat. These may include phytic acid, protease inhibitors, amylase inhibitors, lectins, tannins, saponins, and goitrogens (3). Grain fiber is also a rich source of vitamins and minerals, although the minerals are mostly inaccessible due to grains' high phytic acid content (4, 5, 6).
Every plant food (and some animal foods) has its chemical defense strategy, and grains are no different*. It's just that grains are particularly good at it, and also happen to be one of our staple foods in the modern world. If you don't think grains are naturally inedible for humans, try eating a heaping bowl full of dry, raw whole wheat berries.
Human Ingenuity to the Rescue
Humans are clever creatures, and we've found ways to use grains as a food source, despite not being naturally adapted to eating them**. The most important is our ability to cook. Cooking deactivates many of the harmful substances found in grains and other plant foods. However, some are not deactivated by cooking. These require other strategies to remove or deactivate.
Healthy grain-based cultures don't prepare their grains haphazardly. Throughout the world, using a number of different grains, many have arrived at similar strategies for making grains edible and nutritious. The most common approach involves most or all of these steps:
- Soaking
- Grinding
- Removing 50-75% of the bran
- Sour fermentation
- Cooking
In the next post, I'll explain why these processing steps greatly improve the nutritional value of grains, and I'll describe recipes from around the world to illustrate the point.
* Including tubers. For example, sweet potatoes contain goitrogens, oxalic acid, and protease inhibitors. Potatoes contain toxic glycoalkaloids. Taro contains oxalic acid and protease inhibitors. Cassava contains highly toxic cyanogens. Some of these substances are deactivated by cooking, others are not. Each food has an associated preparation method that minimizes its toxic qualities. Potatoes are peeled, removing the majority of the glycoalkaloids. Cassava is grated and dried or fermented to inactivate cyanogens. Some cultures ferment taro.
** As opposed to mice, for example, which can survive on raw whole grains.
Fast, Easy Recipes for Weight Loss
The famous Gordon Ramsay shows a guy who's never made a meal for his wife in 18 months, how to cook them. See more of his cooking tutorial videos here.
Do I need a lymphatic massage?
The lymphatic system is a system in the body that secrete interstitial fluid, which collects debris such as dead cells, bacteria, inorganic materials, waste products, fats, protein, toxins and water. Therefore it is essential for the lymph to be transported well in the system, to maintain healthy bodily functions.
Today, lymphatic massage can be found in many modern salons and day spas. Most spas proposes manicures and pedicures, facial, various massage, and body treatment. And they are even provides you bikini wax phoenix or brazilian wax scottsdale. Hemm..... Many women who enjoy and love waxing and said they would look sexier after wax process. A little pain is not a problem. But don't want to be forced to adjust to an aesthetic that embraced by the porn industry about pubic hair. Do it if you enjoy it and tell your spouse “take me as I am”.
Finally, lymphatic massage is also useful for people with sports injuries such as joint pain help your body to heal and recover from injury. Lymphatic massage can be a valuable complement to your regular wellness program.
Selasa, 27 April 2010
Day 16/365 Rough day=chocolate?
My two girls wanted EVERYTHING, pointing at this, grabbing at that. It wasn't too terribly distracting, I have learned to just ignore their pleas and press forward. It wasn't until we got to the end of the trip where I just about lost it.
We got to the whole foods isle. You know, the area where you fill up your own bags from the bulk bins. Each daughter had an idea what they wanted and I was letting them get one item. Suddenly, just as I noticed one of them reach in and grab a peanut butter malt ball thingy with her bare hand (I am a germ-o-phobe. So it was grossing me out to think that others probably do the same) and I was telling her that you can't do that and to put it into a separate bag so we could buy it, my baby decided to shot put a jar of grape jelly out of the cart!
Dumbfounded, I started to pick up what I could have of this shattered, sticky jar with a handful of plastic bags. I picked it up the best I could and then grabbed a clerk to get a mop to do the rest. Frustrated, and realizing that I may have a shard of glass in my finger, I marched over to the chocolate section. After a day like that at the store, I surely deserved some seriously yummy chocolate.
So we went over to the section with varieties of chocolate, the GOOD chocolate. I looked at the different flavors and realized that I really didn't want to eat it. I didn't want to thwart my plans, just because I was a little (okay a lot) frustrated. So the idea came that I should tweet about the frustration and walk away. So I snapped a shot of my two most favorite flavors, tweeted on Twitter, walked away and I felt a whole bunch better.
This is what I did today:
Elliptical: 15 min @ level 15
Day 6 Birthday Dinner Triumph!
Senin, 26 April 2010
Day 15/365 Sugar is Addictive & Artificial Sweeteners Kill
So the beginning of last week, I wasn't feeling very good. I felt slightly nauseated so I didn't eat much. I drank a lot of Pero with milk and just enough peanut butter filled pretzels so I wasn't hungry. Light on the stomach, a little protein and a good number of carbs. It kept my stomach calm and I was able to do my daily routine.
So at the end of the week, when I started to feel better I noticed I wasn't craving a thing. My appetite came back, but the craving for something crunchy, sweet, salty, smooth, savory, gooey, etc.wasn't there. It's ALWAYS there, so I thought about what was different?
For the whole week, eating like a bird, I didn't have anything sugary. It reminded me that when we can get the sugar out of our system (which takes a few days) we don't have that pull to get more. Why can't I just remember such a thing and ward off sugar for the rest of my life? Weight control would be a cinch! Because life is made up of sugar moments. That's how we celebrate, through sweets.
Some say, "Well that's easy. You can have your sweet without the effects of sugar by consuming sugar-free foods." Yes, that is a solution, but not one I am willing to take. Sweet chemicals are worse on your body than the real thing. They're chemicals and there are many ramifications for putting such gunk into your body. A great article HERE that shows the positive/negatives of many artificial sweeteners.
When I was in school studying Holistic Nutrition, one of our texts was: "Excitoxins:The Taste that Kills" by Russell L. Blaylock. After reading this book, I was convinced to NEVER touch another artificial sweetener again. It explains that certain additives in our food excite our brain so much, that it kills the neurons. Makes sense when the sweetener you are consuming is 160-220 times sweeter than sugar.
So if you want something sweet, by all means, choose something made with sugar! Just know that it will cause cravings and that to rid yourself of cravings, you'll have to avoid it for a bit until you get control of your system. You don't get something for nothing, everything has consequences. You just need to be responsible with it like anything else we consume, and you'll be fine. Understanding our bodies and how sugar effects our efforts, is half the battle in the weight lost journey.
This is what I did today:
Elliptical: 15 min @ level 10
Hundred Push-up Challenge: Week 3 Day 1 (80 push-ups)
Day 14/365 Sunday - Oops!
Later today, I am going to blog about the addictive pull of sugar and how it effects our healthy efforts.
This is what I did today:
Elliptical: 15 min @ level 10
Minggu, 25 April 2010
Ham & Egg Casserole for Dinner
How to get in shape without doing any exercises
lose weight
very quick, you need to try Proactol. Don't think: "I don't need this."I am sure that offers like this happens only once per life, if you want to change your life, you need to do anything. Everything depends on you...
A week off helped get my head back on straight
After a fitful night of sleep last Monday (I'm sleeping the sleep of the damned again), I woke up up exhausted. My first thought that day was "I'm so tired I just can't do it today." Normally I ignore these thoughts. Exercise has become a habit after two years. That morning I decided maybe it was time to take a break.
I got up and looked at my exercise calendar and realized I hadn't had a day off from exercise since Easter. Fourteen straight days of exercise. My body was sore and tired. My left elbow and shoulder had been aching for days. An old injury that happened about six months ago when I was trying to lift 25-pound dumbbells when I wasn't ready to move up on weights.
My previous week's workouts had been pathetic. Each day was a struggle. Each day I'd written in my exercise journal something negative. "Too hard today!" or "Just not into it." or "Worst workout ever!" I was going through the motions but my heart wasn't in it.
I decided last Monday maybe it was time to ease up on myself a little. In the NRWL4W it says you should take a recovery week between stages. It talks about the necessity of letting the body recover, the connective tissues, nervous system and bones need a week off every once and a while. I've ignored this advice for over two years for fear of falling into another one of my long term bouts of not exercising at all and gaining back weight like it was my job (history repeating itself).
The previous week I lost four pounds and was down to 164.8. If you want to lose one pound you need a 3500 calorie deificit. Multipy that by four and that means I had a 14,000 calorie deficit the previous week. No wonder each workout had been tortuous and miserable. I was starving. I wasn't tracking my food, just eating a lot less.
Last week I was in the mood of "to hell with all of it". The one thing I continued was my ban on sugar. I ate good, healthy food. The cravings are still non-existent, the night-time binges are a thing of the past. I still get hungry, but nothing like when I was hooked on Weight Watcher ice cream bars and other "healthy" junk foods that are full of sugar.
My weigh in yesterday showed I was up 1.4 pounds. I'm not upset or worried about it, I'm not freaking out over the small gain. I needed the added calories. I needed to eat and take a break. I'm finally learning to listen to my body.
Yesterday my workout was probably one of the best workouts of my life. During my hour and forty-five minutes of cardio and strength, I was energized. I felt much stronger than the last several weeks. Taking a week off was probably the best thing I could have done for myself.
Yesterday I was back to tracking my food, making sure I eat enough, but not eating too much. It's a fine line I walk these days between not starving myself and making sure I'm getting in the calories I need, yet still lose weight. It feels good to be back, back in control, back to exercising. Back to being me.
Cold Turkey on Processed Foods
She used to weigh 250 pounds at 5'5''.
She lost the weight by joining a gym and exercising regularly. But she says “You can’t out-exercise a bad diet”. And so she also went cold turkey on Day 1 in terms of throwing out all sweets and processed foods and switching to lean protein and fresh fruits and vegetables. Her kids (age 4 and 7) have learned to love sushi.
Check out her weight loss success story and before and after photos here.
The photo here shows a Sushi-Sashimi Combo. 7 pieces of nigiri, 13 pieces of sashimi and a spicy tuna roll.
Sabtu, 24 April 2010
Day 13/365 A Habit
This is what I did today:
Elliptical: 30 min @ level 10
Poached Eggs over Sauteed Spinach Greens
Birthday Gift for You in the General Store
Jumat, 23 April 2010
Day 12/365 Illness
So far it seems like a guys version of Hunger Games. Lots of questions, a fight for survival, suffering, death, teenagers and certainly a page turner because the book keeps you wondering what is going on.
A little food for thought here. I also got the virus that attacked my family. The others in the family that came down sick, were very sick. Me on the other hand, only got a touch of it. I contribute this to the fact that I am working out everyday. I have noticed that when I regularly workout, my immune system is stronger. This is another motivation to create a regular routine.
This is what I did today:
Elliptical: 30 min @ level 10
Hundred Push-up Challenge: Week 2 Day 3 (81 push-ups)
Have Seed Oils Caused a Multi-Generational Obesity Epidemic?
Linoleic acid is an omega-6 polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) that makes up a large proportion of seed oils. It's a very bioactive molecule, in part because it's the precursor of two classes of signaling molecules (eicosanoids and endocannabinoids), some of which influence the development of fat tissue and regulate appetite.
Dr. Ailhaud and his colleagues pointed out that not only are people eating far more linoleic acid than ever before; that very same linoleic acid is accumulating in our fat tissue and showing up in breast milk. Here are a few graphs to illustrate the point. The first graph is of PUFA consumption in the US over the last century, primarily reflecting seed oil intake (based on USDA food disappearance records):
Here's a graph of added fat intake based on USDA data. Added animal fats such as butter and lard have remained stable since 1970 (although total animal fat intake has declined), while seed oil consumption has gone from high to higher:
The following graph shows linoleic acid accumulation in human body fat over the last few decades in Western nations (mostly the US). I put this together based on two references (2, 3). I didn't find any data from the US past 1986. Linoleic acid, unlike most other fatty acids, accumulates disproportionately in body fat (4):
And finally, linoleic acid in the breast milk of US mothers, from Dr. Ailhaud's 2006 paper (the black dots):
In 2009, Dr. Ingeborg Hanbauer published a paper showing that when mice are fed a diet with a poor omega-6:3 balance (77:1), after three generations they develop adult obesity (5). Mice fed the same diet with a better omega-6:3 balance (9.5:1) did not develop obesity, and remained smaller overall. This shows that PUFA imbalance can cause multi-generational effects resulting in obesity and excessive tissue growth. Cmdr. Joseph Hibbeln, a collaborator of Dr. Bill Lands, was an author. The thing I don't like about this paper is they didn't quantify the obesity by measuring fat mass, so we have to take the authors' word that they had more fat.
This week, Dr. Florence Massiera and collaborators published a similar paper titled “A Western-like fat diet is sufficient to induce a gradual enhancement in fat mass over generations” (6). Drs. Ailhaud and Guesnet were both on this paper. They showed that a 35% fat diet with an omega-6:3 ratio of 28 caused obesity that progressively increased over four generations of mice. Although this study was more detailed than the study by Dr. Hanbauer and colleagues, it lacked a comparison group with a more favorable omega-6:3 balance to show that the obesity was specifically the result of omega-6:3 imbalance, rather than the fact that the diet was higher in fat overall or some other aspect of its composition.
If this is true in humans, it would be a straightforward explanation for the obesity epidemic that has plagued the Western world in recent decades. It would explain why the epidemic began in children around 1970, but didn’t show up in adults until about 1980. It would explain why the epidemic is less severe in Europe, and even less so in Asia. And of course, it correlates well with trends in seed oil consumption. This graph is based on US NHANES survey data:
We already know that a number of prenatal factors can have an effect on adult body fat levels in rodents, and observational studies have suggested that the same may apply to humans. If a mother’s body fat is full of linoleic acid, she will pass it on to the fetus as it grows, and after birth in breast milk, influencing its development.
As long-time followers of Whole Health Source know, I suspect industrial seed oils contribute to many of our modern ills. I can’t say for sure that seed oils are responsible for the current obesity epidemic, but the evidence certainly gives me pause. In any case, seed oils are an unnatural part of the human diet and it won’t hurt anyone to avoid them. The half-life of linoleic acid in fat tissue is about two years, so reducing it is a long-term prospect.
Have Seed Oils Caused a Multi-Generational Obesity Epidemic?
Linoleic acid is an omega-6 polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) that makes up a large proportion of seed oils. It's a very bioactive molecule, in part because it's the precursor of two classes of signaling molecules (eicosanoids and endocannabinoids), some of which influence the development of fat tissue and regulate appetite.
Dr. Ailhaud and his colleagues pointed out that not only are people eating far more linoleic acid than ever before; that very same linoleic acid is accumulating in our fat tissue and showing up in breast milk. Here are a few graphs to illustrate the point. The first graph is of PUFA consumption in the US over the last century, primarily reflecting seed oil intake (based on USDA food disappearance records):
Here's a graph of added fat intake based on USDA data. Added animal fats such as butter and lard have remained stable since 1970 (although total animal fat intake has declined), while seed oil consumption has gone from high to higher:
The following graph shows linoleic acid accumulation in human body fat over the last few decades in Western nations (mostly the US). I put this together based on two references (2, 3). I didn't find any data from the US past 1986. Linoleic acid, unlike most other fatty acids, accumulates disproportionately in body fat (4):
And finally, linoleic acid in the breast milk of US mothers, from Dr. Ailhaud's 2006 paper (the black dots):
In 2009, Dr. Ingeborg Hanbauer published a paper showing that when mice are fed a diet with a poor omega-6:3 balance (77:1), after three generations they develop adult obesity (5). Mice fed the same diet with a better omega-6:3 balance (9.5:1) did not develop obesity, and remained smaller overall. This shows that PUFA imbalance can cause multi-generational effects resulting in obesity and excessive tissue growth. Cmdr. Joseph Hibbeln, a collaborator of Dr. Bill Lands, was an author. The thing I don't like about this paper is they didn't quantify the obesity by measuring fat mass, so we have to take the authors' word that they had more fat.
This week, Dr. Florence Massiera and collaborators published a similar paper titled “A Western-like fat diet is sufficient to induce a gradual enhancement in fat mass over generations” (6). Drs. Ailhaud and Guesnet were both on this paper. They showed that a 35% fat diet with an omega-6:3 ratio of 28 caused obesity that progressively increased over four generations of mice. Although this study was more detailed than the study by Dr. Hanbauer and colleagues, it lacked a comparison group with a more favorable omega-6:3 balance to show that the obesity was specifically the result of omega-6:3 imbalance, rather than the fact that the diet was higher in fat overall or some other aspect of its composition.
If this is true in humans, it would be a straightforward explanation for the obesity epidemic that has plagued the Western world in recent decades. It would explain why the epidemic began in children around 1970, but didn’t show up in adults until about 1980. It would explain why the epidemic is less severe in Europe, and even less so in Asia. And of course, it correlates well with trends in seed oil consumption. This graph is based on US NHANES survey data:
We already know that a number of prenatal factors can have an effect on adult body fat levels in rodents, and observational studies have suggested that the same may apply to humans. If a mother’s body fat is full of linoleic acid, she will pass it on to the fetus as it grows, and after birth in breast milk, influencing its development.
As long-time followers of Whole Health Source know, I suspect industrial seed oils contribute to many of our modern ills. I can’t say for sure that seed oils are responsible for the current obesity epidemic, but the evidence certainly gives me pause. In any case, seed oils are an unnatural part of the human diet and it won’t hurt anyone to avoid them. The half-life of linoleic acid in fat tissue is about two years, so reducing it is a long-term prospect.
Kamis, 22 April 2010
Rabu, 21 April 2010
Day 10/365 - The Power of Perception is Underestimated
I noticed in the mirror today and I noticed something had changed. I looked at my self from all sorts of angles and I swear there was a huge difference. Seriously. It looked to me like I lost about 10 pounds in my thighs alone. Could that be possible in only 10 days?
My reflection had changed, I was sure of it. So I hopped on the scale, there was a little difference in numbers, but nothing to declare yet. So I looked at myself in the mirror again, and I wasn't repulsed by my reflection in my jeans, I was actually surprised that I was pleased. What had changed??
In 10 days, my body couldn't have changed that much, it's impossible to have great physical change in such a short period of time. But 10 days can make a HUGE difference in perception. After having 10 positive days, my self image is changing. I am feeling confident, strong and positive. I have faith that I am going to have an "after" picture sometime this year to be proud of. The power of perception is certainly underestimated. Perception is powerful and it can also work in the other direction as well.
When we have a negative perception of ourselves, it works the same way. We feel inferior, weak and unable to do anything positive. How can we ever expect to be successful in our weight loss/health efforts, or anything in life, if we are working against ourselves? We can't.
How is the perception of yourself? Is it working for you, or against you?
This is what I did today:
Elliptical: 15 min @ level 10
Hundred Push-up Challenge: Week 2 Day 2 (71 push-ups)
Selasa, 20 April 2010
Day 9/365 - Feeling lame but doing it anyway
NOPE.
Listen to your body in times such as these. I did't feel good, but I wasn't bed ridden. I didn't feel strong enough to go all gusto, but I got on my elliptical anyway. I didn't really have a plan on how long I would go, just thought I would play it by ear. So I grabbed a book, and got to it. I got into the book, checked the timer, and it said 15 minutes, so I ended it there. No. More. Excuses.
This is what I did today:
Elliptical: 15 min @ level 10
Senin, 19 April 2010
Day 8/365 - Pictures are certainly deceiving
My toughest weight challenge starts at my belly button and goes down to my knees. If you would like an idea of what I look like today, just add 5 pounds to that area in the "during" photo on the side.
Although I did my last challenge 40 pounds heavier, it's often harder to get the last bit off and so this time around, I will have some great challenges to blog about I am sure.
Evenings are the best time for be to workout for so many reasons:
- It's the toughest time of day to stick to my goals, because at the end of the day, I am tired and I start to not care.
- I am an evening snacker.
- Exercise curbs my appetite and my cravings.
- The kids are in bed so I can do it without any distractions.
I haven't been sleeping well and I am exhausted right now. I could crash if I went to bed, but I have a challenge to attend to...
This is what I did today:
Elliptical: 20 min @ level 10
Hundred Push-up Challenge: Week 2 Day 1 (63 push-ups)
Carbonated Beverages & Weight Loss Surgery
Fresh Strawberries with Creamy Lime Custard
Minggu, 18 April 2010
Sunday - THIS.IS.IT.
- I am going to be open and share what I am doing/eating/learning.
- I am also going to get the "after" picture that I have been promising.
- I am feeling strong, positive and pretty much ticked that I haven't done this already.
- No amount of stress or illness is going to get in my way.
- This.is.going.to.happen!!
I welcome you to follow me on this journey of mine.
Dinner with Taubes, Eades and Hujoel
Gary's first target was the commonly held idea that obesity is simply caused by eating too much and exercising too little, and thus the cure is to eat less and exercise more. He used numerous examples from both humans and animals to show that fat mass is biologically regulated, rather than being the passive result of voluntary behaviors such as eating and exercise. He presented evidence of cultures remaining lean despite a huge and continuous surplus of food, as long as they stayed on their traditional diet. He also described how they subsequently became obese and diabetic on industrial foods (the Pima, for example).
He then moved into what he feels is the biological cause of obesity: excessive insulin keeping fat from exiting fat cells. It's true that insulin is a storage hormone, at the cellular level. However, fat mass regulation involves a dynamic interplay between many different interlacing systems that determine both overall energy intake and expenditure, as well as local availability of nutrients at the tissue level (i.e., how much fat gets into your fat tissue vs. your muscle tissue). I think the cause of obesity is likely to be more complex than insulin signaling.
He also offered the "carbohydrate hypothesis", which is the idea that carbohydrate, or at least refined carbohydrate, is behind the obesity epidemic and perhaps other metabolic problems. This is due to its ability to elevate insulin. I agree that refined carbohydrate, particularly white flour and sugar, is probably a central part of the problem. I'm also open to the possibility that some people in industrial nations are genuinely sensitive to carbohydrate regardless of what form it's in, although that remains to be rigorously tested. I don't think carbohydrate is sufficient to cause obesity per se, due to the many lean and healthy cultures that eat high carbohydrate diets*. Gary acknowledges this, and thinks there's probably another factor that's involved in allowing carbohydrate sensitivity to develop, for example excessive sugar.
I had the opportunity to speak with Gary at length on Thursday, as well as on Friday at dinner. Gary is a very nice guy-- a straightforward New York personality who's not averse to a friendly disagreement. In case any of you are wondering, he looks good. Good body composition, nice skin, hair and teeth (apologies to Gary for the analysis). Philippe and his wife took us out to a very nice restaurant, where we had a leisurely four-hour meal, and Dr. Mike Eades was in town so he joined us as well. Mike has a strong Southern accent and is also a pleasant guy. Philippe and his wife are generous and engaging people. It was a great evening. The restaurant was nice enough that I wasn't going to be picky about the food-- I ate everything that was put in front of me and enjoyed it.
* I'm talking about prevention rather than cure here. I acknowledge that many people have had great success losing fat using low-carbohydrate diets, including two gentlemen I met on Thursday.
Dinner with Taubes, Eades and Hujoel
Gary's first target was the commonly held idea that obesity is simply caused by eating too much and exercising too little, and thus the cure is to eat less and exercise more. He used numerous examples from both humans and animals to show that fat mass is biologically regulated, rather than being the passive result of voluntary behaviors such as eating and exercise. He presented evidence of cultures remaining lean despite a huge and continuous surplus of food, as long as they stayed on their traditional diet. He also described how they subsequently became obese and diabetic on industrial foods (the Pima, for example).
He then moved into what he feels is the biological cause of obesity: excessive insulin keeping fat from exiting fat cells. It's true that insulin is a storage hormone, at the cellular level. However, fat mass regulation involves a dynamic interplay between many different interlacing systems that determine both overall energy intake and expenditure, as well as local availability of nutrients at the tissue level (i.e., how much fat gets into your fat tissue vs. your muscle tissue). I think the cause of obesity is likely to be more complex than insulin signaling.
He also offered the "carbohydrate hypothesis", which is the idea that carbohydrate, or at least refined carbohydrate, is behind the obesity epidemic and perhaps other metabolic problems. This is due to its ability to elevate insulin. I agree that refined carbohydrate, particularly white flour and sugar, is probably a central part of the problem. I'm also open to the possibility that some people in industrial nations are genuinely sensitive to carbohydrate regardless of what form it's in, although that remains to be rigorously tested. I don't think carbohydrate is sufficient to cause obesity per se, due to the many lean and healthy cultures that eat high carbohydrate diets*. Gary acknowledges this, and thinks there's probably another factor that's involved in allowing carbohydrate sensitivity to develop, for example excessive sugar.
I had the opportunity to speak with Gary at length on Thursday, as well as on Friday at dinner. Gary is a very nice guy-- a straightforward New York personality who's not averse to a friendly disagreement. In case any of you are wondering, he looks good. Good body composition, nice skin, hair and teeth (apologies to Gary for the analysis). Philippe and his wife took us out to a very nice restaurant, where we had a leisurely four-hour meal, and Dr. Mike Eades was in town so he joined us as well. Mike has a strong Southern accent and is also a pleasant guy. Philippe and his wife are generous and engaging people. It was a great evening. The restaurant was nice enough that I wasn't going to be picky about the food-- I ate everything that was put in front of me and enjoyed it.
* I'm talking about prevention rather than cure here. I acknowledge that many people have had great success losing fat using low-carbohydrate diets, including two gentlemen I met on Thursday.
My weigh-in and my best weight loss advice
Sabtu, 17 April 2010
Saturday - Feeling in Charge
When having a hard time with my weight, I can tell that I am, not just by the obvious signs of the scale, but by how I feel. It's harder to pass buy the things I really shouldn't eat and hard to get the things I should. Often times, out of frustration I may even eat more just so I can do better the next day. What has recently been the saboteur for me is thinking, "If I can just get rid of it today, I can have a better day tomorrow." So I find myself eating "one more bit of ice cream" or "another half of cookie." I can safely say my eating habits hadn't returned to what they were, but they had gotten to a point that I would have slowly gained back every bit of weight I lost last year.
I am feeling like my head is back in the game. That I am able to think before I eat. Just taking that moment to really THINK about what you are doing before you do it can make the difference between feeling on top of eating, or feeling consumed by it. It really is that simple, although sometimes it doesn't feel that way. You have to have faith in yourself and know that you can do it if you choose to do it. Really CHOOSE to do it, not just passively agree to do it. That's not a strong enough conviction, and without real conviction, you can't permanently make change.
This is what I did today:
Elliptical: 30 min @ level 10